Showing posts with label Anton Stadler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anton Stadler. Show all posts

Feb 28, 2021

Unknown Stadler Documents (Part 2)

Joseph Stadler's unknown probate file

On 17 March 1771, the shoemaker Joseph Stadler died of tuberculosis in the house Mariahilf 73, "Zum goldenen Greifen" (today Stiftgasse 3).

The entry in the municipal death register concerning Joseph Stadler's death on 17 March 1771 (A-Wsa, Totenbeschreibamt 65, S, fol. 19v). Harald Strebel managed to even mistranscribe this simple entry. In unmerciful incompetence, Strebel also mistranscribed the entry concerning Joseph Stadler's obsequies ([A-Wstm 8, 448] Strebel 2016/2, 39).
                    [Martÿ 771 den 17t]
Stadler Joseph Schuster ist beÿn gold[enen] Kreifen zu
M: Hülf an der Lunglsucht b[e]sch[au]t worde[n] alt
52 J[ahr] Abents um 5 Uhr v[er]sch[ieden] AH:

Stadler Joseph, shoemaker at the Golden Griffin in
Mariahilf was inspected to have died of tuberculosis at the age
of 52 years, passed away at 5 p.m. Anton Hochmayr [coroner]
Joseph Stadler and Sophie Altmann, the parents of the clarinetist brothers Anton and Johann Stadler, had married on 21 October 1743, at St. Michael in Vienna. The reason for choosing this church was the fact that the bride lived in the Windmühle suburb which was then located in the parish of St. Michael's. The following entry in the parish's Verkündbuch concerning the publication of the banns for this wedding has never been published correctly. Strebel's transcription of this entry (based on a photograph I sent him in 2010) contains a number of stunning mistakes, such as a "Volekonisches Haus auf dem Stockmarkt[sic!]", and the nonsensical words "ultra quodam decem anni" (Strebel 2016/2, 38). Strebel's musings about Michael Altmann's possible ancestors (Strebel 2016/1, 24f.) are completely erroneous.


The entry concerning the three publications of the banns, beginning on 28 September 1743, for the wedding of Joseph Stadler and Sophie Altmann (A-Wstm, Verkündbuch 22, 82).

28 7bris 1743.                  copulati sunt 21 8bris
Joseph Stadler ein Schuchmacher von Tellershaimb
in Öestreich gebürthig des Andres Stadler und
Susannæ beeder Ehl[icher] Sohn Nimbt zur Ehe die
tugendsame Jungfr[au] Sophia Altmanin alhier
gebürthig des H. Michaël H Altman und Fraue[n]
Barbaræ beeder Ehl[iche] Tochter beÿ d[em] grüne[n]
Thor auf der windmühl beede wonhaft.
Test[es] H. Ignatius Flackl bürg[erlicher]
Goldarbeiter in Volckerische[n] Haus
auf d[em] Kollmarckt. H: Martin
Horn ein schreiber beÿ d[em] Schwartze[n]
Rössel in der Rossau.

Ambo in Parochia
Sponsus ultra quadrantem
anni et
Sponsa semp[er] ibidem.

1.    2.    3.       adsunt.
[translation:]
On 28 September 1743.      They were united on 21 October [1743]
Joseph Stadler, a shoemaker born in Döllersheim in Austria, legitimate son of Andreas and Susanna Stadler, takes as wife the virtuous maiden Sophia Altmann, born here, legitimate daughter of Michael Altmann and his wife Barbara, both living at the Green Door [Windmühlgasse 7] in the Windmühle [district].
Witnesses: Mr. Ignatius Flackl, civil goldsmith at Count Volkra's house [Kohlmarkt 7] on the Kohlmarkt, and Mr. Martin Horn, scribe at the Black Horse [Bauernfeldplatz 4] in the Rossau.
Both are living in the parish
The groom for more than a quarter of a year, and the bride has always been living at the same place.
1st   2nd   3rd   [publication of the banns]       The couple is present.

Joseph Stadler's probate file (the so-called Sperrs-Relation) has previously been considered lost, and the reason for this presumption is quite curious. As a resident of the suburb of Mariahilf, Joseph Stadler was under the jurisdiction of the Vienna Domkapitel (Cathedral Chapter). Thus, the probate files of the Mariahilf residents form a separate archival holding (A-Wsa, Patrimonialherrschaften, Serie 2.1.1.10.A1b) which is very small compared to that of the municipal civil court and, similar to the Sperrs-Relationen of the Alte Ziviljustiz (A-Wsa, Städtische Justizbehörden, Serie 1.2.3.1.A2), is not subdivided into years and numbers, but initials, fascicles and numbers. In 1771, two people named Joseph Stadler died in the suburb of Mariahilf: the Sperrs-Relation of first one is filed under "S, Fasz. 4–115". Because this file is not extant, the entry "Stadler Joseph seel: Abhdl." in the register (A-Wsa, Patrimonialherrschaften, B10/1) became a misleading bogus find which made researchers stop looking for another person named Joseph Stadler. About the first document Harald Strebel writes the following: "Die Verlassenschaftsabhandlungen[sic!] nach Joseph Stadler (Patrimonialherrschaften, Domkapitel, Abhandlungen lit. S. Fasz. 4–115) haben sich nicht erhalten." (Strebel, 2016/1, 34, fn 93). The second Joseph Stadler, who is the right one, appears two pages later in the register in the entry "Stadler Joseph v. Maria Hilf seel:[ig] Verlass:[enschaft]", with the Sperrs-Relation bearing the shelfmark "S. Fasz. 5–206". Back in 2011, when I did research for my article about Mozart's godson Wolfgang Amadé Nebe (Lorenz 2011), I also thought that the file in question is lost. But I soon continued the search and found the document. The discovery of Joseph Stadler's probate file resolves a number of questions concerning the genealogy of the Stadler family, because it shows which of Joseph and Sophia Stadler's children were still alive at the time of their father's death. Owing to Joseph Stadler's modest assets, his Sperrs-Relation consists of only two folded sheets in folio format: 1) the report (Relation) by the judge Johann Andreas Weigl to the court of the Domkapitel about Joseph Stadler's death and its legal procedural consequences, and 2) a bill, dated 10 May 1771, submitted to the court by the glover Johann Götz, concerning a number of garments that Götz had made, and requested to be paid. The text on fol. 1r of the document has different dates of origin and must be read and edited accordingly. Chronologically, the rubrum, written on a quarter of the first page, is the introduction of the judge's statement on fol. 2v. Then the document must be turned again to read the response of the court.

Fol. 1r of Joseph Stadler's Sperrs-Relation with the judge's rubrum in the lower right quarter (A-Wsa, Patrimonialherrschaften, Serie 2.1.1.10.A1b, lit. S, Fasz. 5–206). The court's response is written on the remaining space of the page.
[fol. 1r]
Stadler Joseph
                                            ps. 10 April 1771
Metropolitan Dom Capitl
Ex offo erstattende Relation
Johann Andre Weigl p:t: Richters zu Maria Hilf

Den beÿ dem goldenen Greifen ab intestato verstorbenen Inwohner Joseph Stadler und beÿ inberührten weiteren beliebigen Erkanntnus betref[end]

Fol. 1v of Johann Andreas Weigl's report to the Domkapitel court (A-Wsa, Patrimonialherrschaften, Serie 2.1.1.10.A1b, lit. S, Fasz. 5–206).

[fol. 2v]
                         Hochwürdiges Metropol[itan] Dom Capitl
Gnädige Herren demnach der Joseph Stadler gewester Inwohner beÿ den goldenen Greifen zu Maria Hilf ab intestato verstorben, und 3 Söhne benanntl:[ich] Johann Georg 24 Jahre Anton 18 und Johannes 15 hinterlassen, habe ich die gewöhnliche Juris dictions Spörr angeleget, beÿ untersuchung des Vermögens aber von der Wittib vernommen, wie daß dieser ihr Ehemann wegen seiner angehaltenen langwirrigen Krankheit nicht einen Kreützer verdienen können, und dahero nebst ihrem alltägl[ichen] Verdienst annoch in einer Schulden Last pr 208 fr verflochten wäre, allermassen sie nebst beÿ dem grösseren Sohn von dem Soldaten Leben loß gekaufet, und dieser wie auch die andern 2 mit erlehrnung der Music sehr vieles gekostet hätten;
Welche umstände ich hiemit ex offo einberichten, und des weiters beliebige gnädigen Erkanntnus anheimstellend mich zu beharrliche[n] Hulden und Gnaden empfehlen sollen
            Euer Hochwürden und Gnaden
                                   Gehorsamer
                              Johann Andre Weiglmpia
                               p[leno] t[itulo] Richter alda

[fol. 1r continued]
Diese Relation beÿ der Canzleÿ aufzubehalten, und solle invermelte Wittib Beÿ Nächster session ex offo fürgeforderet werd[en].
      Per Cap[itulum] Metrop[olitanum] Vienn[ens]e
      den 10 April 771
                        0
Beÿ der anheunt über des abintestato ohne Hinterlassung einiger Mittel verstorbenen Joseph Stadler, gewesten Innwohner beÿ dem goldenen Greifen zu Maria Hilf vorgenommenen Abhandlungs Comission ist in Eines Reverend[issi]mi Cap[ituli] Metrop[olitani] Sÿndicats=Canzleÿ persöhnl[ich] erschienen die Sophia Stadlerin Wittib mit ihrem Majorennen Sohn Johann
                       0
Georg Stadler, und nachdeme Sie Stadlerische Wittib vorgestellet hat, wie daß ihr Ehemann wegen seiner angehalten[en] langwehrig[en] Krankheit nicht eines Kreützers werth verdiene[n] können, folgsam auch nichtes verlass[en], sondern Sie Wittib selbsten sich um ihre Kinder in Verdienst zubring[en], und etwas erlehrne[n] zulass[en] annoch 208 f:, gemäß den eingelegten attestatione[n] schuldig seÿe, folgsam also ihren hinterlassenen dreÿe[n] Kindern von ihren väterl[ichen] Erbs=Antheil nichtes auswerfen könnte, sondern Sie selbste[n] von dem als Hebam alltäglichen Verdienst leben müste. Welches auch der gegenwärtig geweste majorene Sohn Johann Georg Stadler comissionaliter contestiret, als will Ein Reverend[issi]mum Cap[itulum] Metrop[olitanum] veranlasset haben:
Daß beÿ diesen sich ausserenden Schuld[en] Umständ[en] d[er] Sophia Stadlerin Wittib ihres Ehewirths Joseph Stadler seel[igen] Verlassenschaft gratis eingeantwortet, und die Jurisdictions Spörr hinwiderum auf weiteres Anlangen angenommen = die eingelegte Attestata aber beÿ diesen Abhandlungs = Acten aufbehalten werd[en] sollen.
                            Per Cap[itulum] Metrop[olitanum] Vienn[ens]e
                            den 10ten Maÿ 1771.
[translation:]
          Revered Metropolitan Cathedral Chapter
Gentlemen, after Joseph Stadler, former resident at the Golden Griffin in Mariahilf has died without leaving a will, and has left 3 sons named Johann Georg, 24, Anton 18, and Johannes 15 years old, I applied the usual jurisdictional restraint. While investigating the estate, however, I learned from the widow that her husband, because of his prolonged and protracted illness, could not earn a single kreuzer and therefore, in addition to her everyday earnings, she is entangled in a debt of 208 gulden, because, in addition to all this, she bought out her elder son from the military, and this son, like the other two, with their musical education cost her a lot of money.
I hereby want to report these circumstances ex officio, and furthermore, by leaving them to the gracious verdict, I commend myself to your persistent favors and graces
      Your Reverence's and Grace's
            obedient
           Johann Andre Weiglmpia
           p:t: local judge

This report should be kept at the office, and the widow mentioned therein should be summoned ex officio to the next session.
        From the Viennese Metropolitan Chapter
        April 10th, 1771

At today's settlement commission concerning Joseph Stadler, former resident at the Golden Griffin in Mariahilf, who died without leaving a will or any funds, the widow Sophia Stadler appeared in person at the most venerable Metropolitan Chapter's syndicate office, together with her full-aged son Johann Georg Stadler. And after the widow Stadler had shown that her husband, owing to his prolonged protracted illness, was unable to earn anything worth one kreuzer, and therefore left nothing behind, but the widow, to bring her children into a job, and have them learn something, (according to the submitted certificates) is now 208 gulden in debt herself, and therefore could not give her three children any share of their paternal inheritance, but has to live from the daily income as a midwife. Which the present full-aged son Johann Georg Stadler also testifies to the commission, therefore a most venerable Metropolitan Chapter requests to have arranged the following:
That in these indebted circumstances the widow Sophia Stadler should be given her deceased husband Joseph Stadler's estate free of charge, and the jurisdictional restraint, on the other hand, should be accepted. The submitted certificates, however, should be kept with these probate files.
        From the Viennese Metropolitan Chapter
        May 10th, 1771.

The second leaf in Joseph Stadler's Sperrs-Relation is a bill submitted by the glover Johann Götz who had manufactured a number of garments for the Stadler couple which had not yet been paid.


The front of the glover Johann Götz's bill in Joseph Stadler's Sperrs-Relation (A-Wsa, Patrimonialherrschaften, Serie 2.1.1.10.A1b, lit. S, Fasz. 5–206)

[3. K. Stempel]    Conto

Was ich endes bemeldter vor die Frau
Stadlern an Hosen und Handschuh
arbeit verferttiget Habe als
                                                                   f.    Xr.
3 Baar Handschuh à 51 X das Baar        – 2 – 33
1 Baar Zacklinn Hosen                           – 2   30
1 Baar Schwarze BockHauttene             – 4   30
2 baar Hirsch Hauttene Hosen das baar à. 5 f – 10   –
   mehr 2 baar Handschuh a 51 Xr        –   1    42. 
                                                                  21 f  15 X.

Wien d[en] 10ten Maÿ 771

                                                          Johan Götz Hand=
                                                          Schuhmacher
[translation:]
[3. kreuzer revenue stamp]       Bill

The trouser and glover work that I, the undersigned, have made for Mrs. Stadler, is the following
3 pairs of gloves, 51 kreuzer a pair                     2 gulden 33 kreuzer
One pair of trousers made of sack linen              2 gulden 30 kreuzer
One pair of black buckskin trousers                    4 gulden 30 kreuzer
Two pairs of deerskin trousers, 5 gulden a pair 10 gulden

Vienna, May 10th, 1771
      Johann Götz glover

 
The back of Johann Götz's bill showing the probate file's shelfmark "Fascic: 5tens S. N° 206" (A-Wsa, Patrimonialherrschaften, Serie 2.1.1.10.A1b, lit. S, Fasz. 5–206)


The biographical implications of the document

Joseph Stadler's probate file allows the following three conclusions to be drawn:

1) Between 1743 and 1763, the Stadler couple did not have ten children, as previously claimed (Strebel 2016/2, 41-44), but twelve. The apparent twins Joseph and Johann Georg Stadler (of whom the latter is mentioned in the above Sperrs-Relation), were born in 1747, in a still unknown place where their parents lived between 1745 and 1749. The first one, Joseph Stadler, died in Bruck an der Leitha on 14 March 1752, at the age of five (Bruck an der Leitha 6, fol. 189r). The second one, Johann Georg, in 1771, had just turned 24, and thus, had reached the legal age necessary to accompany his mother to the court chancellery. He had been drafted into the army and eventually had needed his mother's financial support to buy himself out of the military. At the time of his mother's death in 1790, Johann Georg Stadler was already deceased.

2) At the time of her husband's death in 1771, Sophia Stadler had a fourth son whose existence she chose to conceal from the authorities. Her eldest son Leopold Lorenz Stadler had been born on 15 November 1745, in Vienna. The entry concerning Leopold's baptism is of minor relevance, but since Strebel was unable to correctly transcribe it, it is included here.


The entry concerning the baptism of Leopold Lorenz Stadler on 15 November 1745 (A-Wstm, Tom. 12, 603). The godfather Reinhard Zeiner (1712–1751) was a coffee maker who hailed from Frankfurt. His son Lorenz Zeiner (1739–1790) was to become the municipal coroner who in 1783 inspected the body of Mozart's first child Raimund Leopold (A-Wsa, Totenbeschreibamt 82, M, fol. 30r).
Stadler. Leopoldus, Laurentius, ex P[at]re Josepho Stadler, et / Sophia ejus Cons[orte] |: Schrurmacher[sic] beÿn gold[enen] Ochsen ad / M[ariam] Aux[iliatricem] :| Patr[inus] Reinardus Zeiner, ejus Loco Filius / ejus Laurentius et Rosalia Trostin, obst[etrix] Bezeneggin / a d[omino] Constantino.

Stadler. Leopold Lorenz, son of Joseph Stadler and his wife Sophia, shoemaker at the Golden Ox in Mariahilf. Godfather: Reinhard Zeiner, in his stead his son Lorenz and Rosalia Trost. Midwife: Frau Bezenegg, [the child was baptized] by Father Constantin.
In 1771, at the time of his father's death, Leopold Stadler worked as servant. On 13 November 1771, he married Maria Anna Peer, daughter of a deceased tailor from Baden (A-Wstm, Tom. 7, 452). Leopold Stadler eventually became a barber and, as of 1777, worked as an army surgeon in a quarantine station in Zemun. He seems to have died there before 1785 (Strebel 2016/1, 565f). The reasons why Sophia Stadler concealed her eldest son from the authorities are unknown. Maybe she considered it unfavorable for her situation, if the existence of her eldest son, who was already earning money, would become known.

3) Sophia Stadler's statement that "her two younger sons' musical education had cost her a lot of money" is the first and only documented reference to the actual costs of the musical training of Anton and Johann Stadler. This points to several years of taking lessons with a clarinet master and consigns all considerations regarding a possible autodidactic training of these two legendary virtuosos to the realms of fantasy.


A part of the suburb of Mariahilf on Joseph Daniel von Huber's 1778 Vogelschauplan of Vienna. The encircled building is the Goldener Greif, Mariahilf 73, where Joseph Stadler died. On the upper left behind the Church of Mariahilf is the old cemetery where he was buried (W-Waw, Sammlung Woldan).

The next installment of this series will deal with important Stadler documents that Harald Strebel declared "lost", because he never had the time to do the necessary work in Vienna's archives.



Bibliography
Lorenz, Michael. 2011. "Mozarts Patenkind". Acta Mozartiana, 58, vol. 1, (June 2011), 57–70.

Strebel, Harald. 2016. Anton Stadler: Wirken und Lebensumfeld des "Mozart-Klarinettisten". Fakten, Daten und Hypothesen zu seiner Biographie. Vienna: Hollitzer Wissenschaftsverlag.



© Dr. Michael Lorenz 2021. All rights reserved.

Updated: 19 February 2026   

May 17, 2020

Unknown Stadler Documents (Part 1)

Harald Strebel's book about the legendary clarinetist brothers Anton and Johann Stadler, which, after a very long delay, was published in 2016 by the Hollitzer Wissenschaftsverlag, is one of those works that defy any useful review. Because of its total volume of about 1400 pages, its merciless redundancy, and its numerous and extensive thematic digressions (the author obviously wanted to include every bit of his life's Mozart research), the number of mistakes in this book that any serious review would have to address, would amount to a seperate small book. This kind of procedure – albeit beneficial for interested readers – would yield no reviewer any merit. The damage that the shortcomings of Strebel's book may cause is lessened, however, by the fact that its readership will be very small indeed. And even if somebody should be willing to dive into two bulky tomes, owing to their completely unsystematic and repetitive contentual structure, he will surely have a hard time finding the information he is looking for.

Volume 1 of Harald Strebel's book about Anton Stadler. The silhouette on the cover is a well-known forgery by Josef Kuderna (1886–1952) whose authorship is proved by the inscription below the silhouette in Kuderna's typical fake-historicizing handwriting. Time and again, the Hollitzer Wissenschaftsverlag has shown itself to be so short of material that it will publish almost anything and without any serious proofreading process.

Unfortunately, Strebel lacks all necessary expertise related to eighteenth-century handwritten sources, a skill that can only be acquired through decades of archival research. This lack of experience causes a gross ignorance of the historical vocabulary which is indispensible for the understanding and transcription of archival sources. Unhelpful in dealing with these documents, is Strebel's mercilessly Swiss renunciation of the German letter ß, and his complete ignorance of Latin which leads to a huge number of grammatically wrong transcriptions, such as "quodam decem anni", "a Dominus", "et suae Barbara legitima filiae", "auliae", "ejus loci" (instead of "ejus loco"), "pro tempore" (instead of "pleno titulo"), "ad Mariae auxilium" (instead of "ad Mariam Auxiliatricem"), and "Expeditium" (instead of "expeditum") (Strebel 2016/2, 38, 41, 264, 754). Many of Strebel's flawed transcriptions are extremely entertaining, but there is no use in listing them at this point. This is the author, who in 2010, wrote the following in an e-mail: "It is downright depressing how carelessly certain authors deal with the sources". While going through Strebel's hundreds of transcriptions of Stadler documents, I have not yet found a single one that is free from errors. It is not the first time that one is wondering why an author was unable to at least seek the assistance of an expert who would have guided him to unknown sources and cleared his book from a plethora of errors and mistranscriptions. Countless Stadler documents are given as "lost" by Strebel which in fact do survive. Already in 2006, and again in August 2010, I offered Strebel my help with his research. But after I had given him a lot of genealogical data and sent him 23 pictures of unknown Stadler sources, at some point, his jealous secretiveness and unfounded fear of being exploited got the better of him and he cut off our correspondence. This, of course, could not keep him from shamelessly using some of my photographs in his book – for example the one of Maria Anna Stadler's 1743 baptismal entry, (Strebel 2016/2, 41) – without giving me credit. Not surprisingly, he also mistranscribed the content of the pictures that he used without permission.

The photograph, taken on 9 September 2010, of the entry concerning the previously unknown baptism of Anton Stadler's sister Maria Anna Stadler on 17 August 1743, in the Vienna court chapel (Hofburg, Tom. BB, 156) which, on 10 September 2010, I sent to Harald Strebel.

The same photograph as it appears in Strebel's book (Strebel 2016/2, 41), published without my permission and without giving me credit. The theft of the picture is proved by the identical increase of blurring of the script at the very left. The date of this child's death given in the caption is false, because it already died before 1771. Not only had Strebel the impertinence to present this as a "first publication", he also gravely botched the transcription and translation of this Latin entry.

To avoid a possible misunderstanding: I do not think that every Stadler document is worth publishing. Many of the documents are redundant and of minor relevance. But since Harald Strebel considered every stroke of a pen related to the Stadler families earth-shatteringly relevant, I decided to take this approach ad absurdum in order to show that even the most ambitious claim to completeness in a collection of sources is bound to fail.

Johann Stadler's birth in Bruck an der Leitha

In 1971, in the Mitteilungen der Internationalen Stiftung Mozarteum, the German Kapellmeister Karl Maria Pisarowitz (1901–1979) published a pioneering article about the Stadler brothers. Applying his custom method of research by mail (which is pretty much also Strebel's favorite way of doing research), Pisarowitz was able to examine the entry in the records of Vienna's Piarist Church concerning Anton Stadler's wedding on 12 October 1780. This source, which gives the groom's place of birth as "Pruck an d Leyta", allowed Pisarowitz to locate Anton Stadler's 1753 baptismal entry in the church records of Bruck an der Leitha.

The left half of the entry concerning Anton Stadler's wedding on 12 October 1780 (Maria Treu, Tom. 3, fol. 82). Strebel's transcription of this entry (Strebel 2016/2, 44) contains several mistakes of which only the funniest shall be named. The letters "d. E. W.", which appear twice after the names of the groom's and the bride's mothers, mean "dessen Ehe Wirthin". Strebel nonsensically resolves them as "des Erblichenen Witwe". In his book, Strebel plagiarized countless pieces of information from my 2011 article in Acta Mozartiana, including the sources related to Sophia Stadler's midwife exams and her walk-in maternity clinic in Mariahilf.

In his 1971 article, Pisarowitz stated that "after 1745, for unknown reasons, the Stadler family moved to Bruck an der Leitha where on 28 June 1753, Anton Paul Stadler was born" (Pisarowitz 1971, 30). In 2011, in my article "Mozart's Patenkind", I was able to show that the Stadlers must have moved to Bruck already in 1749, because another son, Anton Joseph, was born there on 14 December 1749. This child already died on 23 December 1749 (Lorenz 2011, 62). Concerning Joseph Stadler's possible motives for relocating his family to the country before December 1749, I described  the situation as quite obvious: Joseph Stadler certainly could not expect to make a better living as a shoemaker in the province. Instead, it is obvious that he changed his profession and entered the service of Count Ernst Guido von Harrach as a musician (Lorenz 2011, 62).

That for decades it was thought that Johann Stadler was born in Vienna, had three reasons: 1) Pisarowitz mistook the entry concerning the publications of the banns in May 1783 in the records of the groom's home parish (Schotten 35, fol. 191r) for Johann Stadler's actual marriage entry. Not only is Johann Stadler erroneously addressed in this entry as "Franz Stadler" (which made Pisarowitz claim that Johann "was just called Franz"), his place of birth is also not given. 2) The entry in the minutes of the Tonkünstler-Sozietät concerning Johann Stadler's acceptance into the society on 16 May 1783 only gives his date, but not his place of birth.

The entry in the minutes of the Tonkünstler-Sozietät concerning Johann Stadler's request, presented on 7 May 1783, to join the society (A-Wsa, Private Institutionen, Haydn-Verein, 2.9.1.2. A2/1). This document was written by Karl Friberth. On 30 November 1798, Johann Stadler was expelled from the society for not paying his membership fees.

3) The entry concerning Johann Stadler's death on 2 May 1804 in the municipal death register gives the deceased as "von Wienn gebürtig" ("born in Vienna"), an error that was obviously caused by the fact that Johann Stadler died in Vienna's General Hospital where nobody knew anything about his origin and background.

The entry in the municipal Totenbeschauprotokoll concerning Johann Stadler's death on 2 May 1804 (A-Wsa, Totenbeschreibamt 117/II, S, fol. 39v)

In 2011, I was the first to publish the fact that Johann Nepomuk Stadler was not born in Vienna, but, like his more prominent brother Anton, in the town of Bruck an der Leitha (Lorenz 2011, 62). Since the quality of the picture of Johann Stadler's baptismal entry in Strebel's book – like many other of his illustrations – is very poor, I take the opportunity to publish a high-quality picture of this document.

The entry concerning Johann Nepomuk Stadler's baptism (son of "Josephus Städler Incola") on 6 May 1755, in the parish church of Bruck an der Leitha (Bruck an der Leitha, Tom. F, Taufen fol. 101r). The next baptism was Anna Christina Platzer's on 17 May 1755 ("Erste Pfing[s]ttauf"), a daughter of Johann Stadler's godfather Anton Platzer.

In his book, Strebel ignores the fact that I published Johann Stadler's place of birth five years before he did, and, to bolster his fictitious priority, he claims in a footnote that "he already found Johann Stadler's baptismal entry in 2008" (Strebel 2016/1, 31). This unproven anecdotal detail, however, is utterly irrelevant, because it took Strebel another eight years to publish this information.

The godparents of five (or more) of Joseph Stadler's children, who were born in Bruck an der Leitha, were the local merchant Anton Platzer and his wife Barbara. Strebel completely disregards these two individuals of whom the first, after all, became Anton Stadler's name giver. Anton Platzer and Barbara Gruber married on 29 February 1740, in Bruck an der Leitha.

The entry concerning Anton Platzer's and Barbara Gruber's wedding on 29 February 1740 (Bruck an der Leitha, Tom. 6, fol. 110v)

In 1773, Anton Platzer's business was declared bankrupt which on 24 July 1773 was announced in the Wiener Zeitung. The legal procedures concerning this bankruptcy lasted until September 1774 (Wiener Zeitung, 7 September 1774). Anton Platzer died on 18 April 1783, at the age of seventy, in Bruck an der Leitha.

The entry concerning Anton Platzer's death on 18 April 1783 (Bruck an der Leitha, Tom. 9, fol. 28)

In the genealogical chapter of his book, Strebel claims that between 1743 and 1763, Joseph and Sophia Stadler had ten children (Strebel 2016/2, 41-44). This number is false. Because Strebel was unable to locate Joseph Stadler's 1771 probate file, and only conducted very cursory research in the Bruck an der Leitha church records, he overlooked the existence of two more Stadler children, namely Joseph and Johann Georg Stadler, who appear to have been twins, and were born in 1747 in a still unknown place where their parents must have lived between 1745 and 1749. The first of these two children, Joseph Stadler, died in Bruck an der Leitha on 14 March 1752, at the age of five (Bruck an der Leitha 6, fol. 189r). The second one, Johann Georg Stadler, joined the military which, eventually, he was only able to quit with the financial support of his mother. He was one of Joseph Stadler's four sons (Leopold, Johann Georg, Anton, and Johann) who were still alive at the time of their father's death in 1771. The still unknown Sperrs-Relation of Joseph Stadler will be published in a future installment of this Stadler Documents series.

Johann Stadler's unknown first marriage entry

There are two known sources related to Johann Stadler's wedding in 1783: first, the entry concerning the three publications of the banns on May 11th, 18th, and 25th, 1783, in which the groom is falsely addressed as "Franz Stadler" (Schotten, Tom. 35, fol. 191r), and second, the entry concerning the actual wedding which took place on 1 June 1783, in the old church of St. Josef ob der Laimgrube (St. Josef ob der Laimgrube, Tom. 1, 5). These two documents – albeit with flawed transcriptions, such as "bevormundt" instead of "befreundt" – are published in Strebel's book (Strebel 2016/2, 55f.). There is, however, a third source related to this wedding which so far has remained unknown. It is the entry in the earliest marriage register of the Laimgrube parish, the so-called Einschreibbuch der Brautleute von der Pfarrei zum H. Joseph ob der Laimgrube für das Jahr 1783 vom 20ten April bis zum letzten Xber 783.


An unknown source like this, which has never been digitized, cannot be discovered by corresponding with Viennese parishes via e-mail. The text in this register is the very first version of Johann Stadler's marriage entry in the records of this parish.

The entry in the earliest marriage register of St. Josef ob der Laimgrube concerning Johann Stadler's wedding (Einschreibbuch der Brautleute von der Pfarrei zum H. Joseph ob der Laimgrube für das Jahr 1783 vom 20ten April bis zum letzten Xber 783, 18).

                               18.
Der Ehr Wohl edle H. Johan Stadler K.K. Kamer=
musikus, leedig, gebürtig von Bruck an der
Leutha, des Joseph Stadler eines Schuma=
chers lebend sel[ig] und der Sophia ux. einer gebor=
nen Altmanin conditio non constat,
Tochter[sic], ehliger Sohn.

|                      |                  |
11. Maÿ      18 Maÿ         25 Maÿ
Test[imonium] denunc[iationis]
a Scotti[bu]s in urbe
tulit.

Großjährig♀ Testim[onium] bapt[ismi] ferat kath.
kein Soldat, wohnhaft in der Stadt
N 1248. über 2 Jahre. laut Zeugniß

♀ 6ta Maji An[no]
1755 baptisatus
est.

Mit der tug[endsamen] Jungf[er] Elisabeth Grittnerin,
gebürtig hier, des Franz Grittner bürgl: Weißger=
bers und der Maria Ana ux[oris] einer ge=
bornen Schecksin einer Schmidstochter, seligg.
ehlige Tochter. Minoren. Sed con=
sensit præs[ens] pater, kathol. nicht befreündt.
wohnhaft an der Wien Nro 42.

Testis. Sponsæ Johann Trost Stadt=
       richter in der Neustadt.
Sponsi Joh. Kilian Strack K. Kamer=
       diener wohnhaft im der+ +Stadt Nro 585.

Copulati sunt
1ma Junij a me
parocho vespere
obteata[sic] dispens[ati]one Rev[erendissimi] Con=
sistor[ii]
[translation:]
[Page No.] 18
The well noble Mr. Johann Stadler, I. & R. chamber musician, unmarried, a native of Bruck an der Leitha, legitimate son of Joseph Stadler, a deceased shoemaker, and his wife Sophia, née Altmann whose condition is unknown, daughter[sic].

[The three publications of the banns took place on]
May 11th, 18 May 18th, and May 25th
[The groom] produced a certificate of proclamation from the Schotten parish in the City.

[The groom is] of legal age.♀ He brought a birth certificate, Catholic
not a soldier, he has been living in the City at No. 1248 for more than 2 years, according to the certificate

♀He was baptised on May 6th, 1755.

With the virtuous maiden Elisabeth Grittner, born here, legitimate daughter of Franz Grittner, a civil tawer, and his wife Maria Anna, née Schecks, already deceased. Underage, but the father is present and consents, Catholic, not related to the groom by blood or marriage. Residing at Laimgrube No. 42.

Witness of the bride: Johann Trost, municipal judge in Wiener Neustadt.
Witness of the groom: Johann Kilian Strack, Imperial chamberlain residing in the City at No. 585.

They were united on June 1st, by me, the parish priest, in the evening after producing a dispense from the most venerable consistory.

The next installment of this Stadler Documents series will deal with Johann Stadler's grandchildren and great-grandchildren whose existence – you guessed it – remained completely unknown to Mr. Strebel.



Bibliography
Lorenz, Michael. 2011. "Mozarts Patenkind". Acta Mozartiana, 58, vol. 1, (June 2011), 57-70.

Pisarowitz, Karl Maria. 1971. „»Müaßt ma nix in übel aufnehma …« Beitragsversuche zu einer Gebrüder-Stadler-Biographie“. Mitteilungen der Internationalen Stiftung Mozarteum 29 (1971), Heft 1-2, 29-33.

Strebel, Harald. 2016. Anton Stadler: Wirken und Lebensumfeld des "Mozart-Klarinettisten". Fakten, Daten und Hypothesen zu seiner Biographie. Vienna: Hollitzer Wissenschaftsverlag.



Addendum

In 2021, Harald Strebel published a thin volume with addenda to his book about the Stadler brothers. These addenda contain several pieces of information previously published above, all of which are of course presented as Strebel's own findings and corrections. 



© Dr. Michael Lorenz 5/17/2020. All rights reserved.

Updated: 19 February 2026

Mar 24, 2013

A Child named Christian Mozart

On 16 November 1789, Constanze Mozart gave birth to a child that was so weak that it only lived for one hour. If a newborn child was very weak or stillborn, it was the midwife's obligation to perform an immediate emergency baptism. In such cases the child was filed under the term "fraugetauft" ("baptized by the midwife"). If the newborn died soon after its birth, no official entry in the baptismal records of the parish was entered up and the child's name and the circumstances of its christening only appear in the records related to the child's burial. In the 1789 death register of the municipal Totenbeschreibamt (A-Wsa, Totenbeschreibamt 92, M, fol. 48v), Mozart's fifth child is given with the rather curious first name "Kristian".

Den 16ten
Mozart          Wohledler H:[err] Wolfgang, K:K: Kapelmeister / s.[ein] frauengetauftes K[ind] Kristian, so bei St. Nicolai / N° 245 am Judenplatz an der Fraißen von / Mutterleib besch[au]t word[en]                             M[atthäus] R[auscher]
Sir Wolfgang Mozart, imperial and royal Kapellmeister, his child Kristian, baptized in emergency, at St. Nicholas No. 245 on the Judenplatz was inspected [as having died] of spasms right after its birth.    Matthäus Rauscher [coroner]
"Kristian" (or "Kristina") was a provisory name for a Christian (i.e. baptized) child which in eighteenth-century Vienna was used in cases of emergency baptisms, as long as the child's real first name was still unknown. When the above entry was made, the coroner of the Totenbeschreibamt did not know the name and the sex of the child yet and simply followed his instructions. Not surprisingly, the death of Mozart's child was not reported in the Wiener Zeitung. What follows are four examples of similar entries in eighteenth-century Vienna death records.

[Den 10 Oktober 1763]
Stadler Joseph ein Schuhmacher sein Frau[en] ge- / tauftes Kind Christian, ist auf der / Windmüll beÿn Grün Thor an d.[er] / Frais b[e]sch[au]t word[en] nachmittag um / 4 uhr Gebohr[en] word[en] J:[ohann] C:[hristian] B:[aldamuß] (A-Wsa, Totenbeschreibamt 57, S, fol. 74v).
This short-lived Christian Stadler was a younger brother of the legendary clarinet players Anton and Johann Nepomuk Stadler. Here is an example from the death records of the Vienna Schotten parish:

Den 30 dito [November 1709] deß Herr[n] Johann / Baptist Hilverting Comedianten / Brincipal, sein Nothgetauftes Kind Christian, in dem Ballhauß, in der / [T]ainfaltstr[aßen]     15 [Kreuzer] (A-Ws, Tom. 2, fol. 119r)
The father of this child Christian was the legendary puppeteer and actor Johann Baptist Hilverding, the father of the dancer Franz Anton Hilverding. Here is an example from the 1734 Totenbeschauprotokoll:

[9 November 1734]
Dem Herrn Francisco Alborea, Kaÿ[serlichem] Hof=Musico / sein Kind Christian, ist in Stadtschloßer[ischen] Hauß am Hof frauen Getaufter an der Frais b[e]sch[au]t worden. (A-Wsa, Totenbeschreibamt 37, fol. 244r)
Francesco Alborea (b. 1691 in Naples, d. 20 July 1739 in Padua [not in Vienna, as given in every encyclopedia]) was one of the most important cello virtuosi of the eighteenth century. He is frequently confused with his son Francesco, the cellist known as "Franciscello". Here is another, final example from the 1776 records of St. Michael's, concerning a female child named "Christina".

[9 January 1776]
Lorenzin Christina / fil:[ia] Ruperti Lorenz / bürg: Schneidermeisters / Cath:[olisch] Zu Maria / Hilf [No.] 8 frau getaufet. (A-Wstm, Tom. 9, p. 187)
When on 17 November 1789, the burial of Mozart's daughter was reported and paid for at the Bahrleiheramt of St. Stephen's (the office that collected burial fees for the Vienna Magistrate), the child's name was still unknown. This resulted in the following entry in the 1789 Bahrleihbuch (which was first published in June 2009, in my article "Mozart's Apartment on the Alsergrund").

Mozart Rub:[rica] 4ta / 2te Class / Pfarr / am / Hofe. / Dem Tit[ulo] Herrn Wolfgang v:[on] / Mozart K:K: Kapellmeister sein / frauget.[auftes] Mädchen, am Juden= / =platz bei St. Nickolai Nro 245. / an d[er] Frais von Mutterleib be = / = schaut, alt – / Im Freÿdhof A:[ußer] Mazlstorf / Bezahlt p [Partheÿen] 1.20. – [Kirche] 30 - / [Summa] 1 f 50 x
Mozart, 4th category, 2nd class, parish Am Hof, a girl baptized in emergency of Herr Wolfgang von Mozart, imperial and royal Kapellmeister, on the Judenplatz at St. Nicholas No. 245, was inspected [as having died] of spasms after her birth. In the cemetery beyond Matzleinsdorf, paid 1 f 20 x [the personnel] 30 x [the church] [overall sum] 1 Gulden 50 Kreuzer. (A-Wd, Bahrleihbuch 1789, fol. 377r)
This is one of six documents I published in 2009 that show Mozart as being addressed with the appropriate particle of nobility "von". By now, the Bahrleiher already knew that the child was a girl, but the continuing uncertainty regarding the child's real name is reflected in the index of the particular volume of the payment records where the "fraugetauftes Mädchen" is given as "v:[on] Mozart Kristina".


We would not know the first name of Mozart's second daughter, if not one of its parents had told Johann Herbst, the priest of the parish church Am Hof, that the child's name was Anna.

The entry concerning the obsequies of Mozart's daughter Anna on 17 November 1789, at the parish church "Zu den Neun Chören der Engel" Am Hof: "Dem Herrn Wolfgang von Mozart K. / K. Käpelmeister sein Kind Anna [Lebensjahre] 1 Stund" (Am Hof, Tom. 1, fol. 48). The picture shows the two halves of the entry whose original goes across two pages.

The first scholar who delved into the Viennese church records related to Mozart's children was Emil Karl Blümml (1881–1925) who in 1919, published an article entitled "Mozarts Kinder", in Mozarteums Mitteilungen, Mai 1919, Heft 3, p. 4 (which he published again in his 1923 book Aus Mozarts Freundes und Familienkreis). Commendable as Blümml's work was 94 years ago, his article does not meet present-day standards, because he overlooked several important sources and misunderstood some of the documents. Blümml's flawed work became a problem only decades later, when in his 1961 edition of Mozart documents, Otto Erich Deutsch decided to spare himself the effort of checking the Viennese parish records in favor of simply referring to Blümml's completely out-of-date article. Deutsch's intriguing aversion to ever step inside a Viennese parish office is one of many reasons why some Viennese Mozart sources remain unpublished to this very day. As far as the name "Kristian" Mozart in the death records was concerned, Blümml had no idea what it meant and showed himself slightly baffled.
Während das kirchliche Protokoll von einem Kinde weiblichen Geschlechtes spricht, verzeichnet das amtliche Beschauprotokoll der Stadt Wien unterm 16. November 1789 einen Knaben. Wer hat demnach recht? Es sei nur bemerkt, daß der Name Christian bei Katholiken zu den Seltenheiten gehört.
While the entry in the parish register speaks of a girl, the official register of deaths of the City of Vienna for 16 November 1789 lists a boy. Which, then, of the two entries is correct? It should be mentioned that the name "Christian" is rare among Catholics.

© Dr. Michael Lorenz 2013. All rights reserved.

Updated: 26 April 2025

Feb 10, 2013

Mozart's Godson

On 29 April 1835, Wolfgang Amadeus Hempel was baptised in the parish church "Zur Heiligen Dreifaltigkeit" in Vienna's Alservorstadt. The fifth child of Friedrich August Hempel, music teacher from Pirna in Saxony, and his wife Maximiliana, née Rattay, received two remarkable names from his godfather Wolfgang Amade Nebe. Nebe, an official of the conscription office of the Vienna Magistrate, along with the child's father and the sacristan of the parish, confirmed with his signature that "it is the explicit desire of the [Protestant] father that this boy is to be raised catholic."

"NB Dieser Knabe wird auf ausdrückliches Verlangen / des Vaters katholisch erzogen. Friedrich August / Hempel als Vater. / Wolfgang Amade Nebemp Magistrat. Conscrip[tions] A:[mts] Officier / Breitenfeld No 15 als Zeug / Johann Hackler Meßner in der Alservorstadt als Zeuge." (Alservorstadt 17, fol. 118)

Wolfgang Amade? These names were highly unusual at this time in Vienna, and at first glance, they suggest that Nebe's father had been an admirer of Mozart who wanted to express this devotion in the choice of names for his son. Further research, however, has shown that Wolfgang Amade Nebe, born in 1787, was in fact named after his prominent godfather Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. The entry concerning his baptism in the records of the Vienna Piarist Church looks as follows.

[Maius 1787]
e. 30 ebend[er]selbe [the priest Julius Gabelhofer] Wolfgang / Gottlieb V. [father] Andreas Nebè fürstl[ich] Palmischer / Kammerdiener M. [mother] Franziska geb. v. Wanderer Haupt / manns fräule [godfather] Johann Sattmann / Vizetumamtschreiber/ anstatt und im Nam[en] des / H[errn] Amadeus Wolfgang / Mozart Kapellmeisters kath[olisch] J[oseph]st.[adt] schöne Schäferin 45 [Josefstädter Straße 11]. [midwife] Stadlerinn.

The godfather and his substitute: "Johann Sattmann Vizetumamtsschreiber instead and on behalf of Mr. Amadeus Wolfgang Mozart capellmeister" (Maria Treu 5, fol. 351)

The discovery of Mozart as godfather could be compared to an unknown room that suddenly opens in Mozart's life. The godchild's father Andreas Nebe (b. 1741 in Hettstedt in Saxony, d. 23 February 1811 in Vienna), was a chamberlain of Count Karl Joseph von Palm-Gundelfingen (1749–1814) who must have made Mozart's acquaintance at the Count's palace in the Obere Schenkenstraße.

Andreas Nebe ("Newe") in the 1788 tax register, paying 42 gulden annual rent for one room, a chamber and a kitchen on the second floor of Josephstadt 45 (A-Wsa, Steueramt B34/25, fol. 99)

Palm-Gundelfingen was a great lover of music and was also one of the subscribers of Mozart's 1784 concerts in the Trattnerhof. The baptism took place on 30 May 1787, in the Piarist Church of Maria Treu, the parish church of a part of the Josephstadt. Mozart could not be present which may have been caused by the fact that on this very day he received word of his father's death on 28 May 1787. Therefore he was substituted by the state official Johann Sattmann (1745–1800), a friend of Nebe or Mozart or both (see the picture above, the key passage in the baptismal entry reading: "anstatt und im Nam[en] des H[errn] Amadeus Wolfgang Mozart Kapellmeisters"). Sattmann was a close friend of the Fröhlich family. His daughter Anna was a singer who in 1803/04 took part in several concerts at the Augarten, and in 1804 was hired by Domenico Guardasoni to the Prague Opera. In 1805, in Prague, she married the singer Christian Wilhelm Häser. The only person present at the christening of Wolfgang Amade Nebe, who could actually be linked to Mozart, was the midwife Sophia Stadler (1724–1790), mother of the two legendary clarinet players Anton and Johann Stadler.

Wolfgang Amade Nebe attended the Piaristengymnasium (where he must have met Karl Thomas Mozart who also attended this school), and in 1807, he became an unpaid employee of the conscription office of the Vienna Magistrate (which was in charge of keeping track of the male populace that was liable to military service). In 1813, he was appointed a definite employee at this office and on 25 November 1813, he took the oath as "Wiener Bürger" (Viennese Citizen).

Wolfgang Amade Nebe, signing as sworn Viennese Citizen (A-Wsa, Bürgerbuch, 1.2.4.1, B1.11, 1805-14, fol. 215r)

Nebe as "Wolfgang Nevée Magistratischer Conscriptions Assesits[sic] led." on an 1830 conscription sheet of Breitenfeld No. 15 (A-Wsa, Konskriptionsamt, KB Breitenfeld 15)

One year after the death of his mother in 1836, Nebe married Anna Dander, née Bartl (1783–1865), the widow of the Tyrolian chestnut vendor Jacob Dander (1781–1831).

Seal and signature of Wolfgang Amade Nebe on his marriage contract (A-Wsa, Mag. ZG, A10, 370/1839)

Perhaps owing to his famous godfather, Wolfgang Amade Nebe thought highly of himself and occasionally pretended to have a social status that he did not have. His self-esteem sometimes bordered on fraud. In his marriage contract he described himself as "Ehren Bürger" (honorary citizen) of Vienna, a status he did not possess; his illiterate wife probably believed it and she certainly also believed him when, on the occasion of their wedding, he told her that he owned assets worth 2,400 Gulden and that his father had been a "doctor of medicine."

A section of Wolfgang Gottlieb Nebe's 1837 marriage entry in which his father is given as "Doctor der Medicin" (Maria Treu 8, fol. 81)
Ledig Wolfgang Gottlieb Nebe, Conskriptions Officier, von Wien / Pfr. Josephstadt geb. 50 J. alt des Andreas Nebe, eines Doctor / der Medicin, und der Francisca Edle v. Wanderer, beyde verst.[orben] e.[helich] e.[erzeugter] S.[ohn]
Witwe Anna Dander, Witwe des Jacob Dander, eines Handlungs- / Dieners, von Eleschtin im Klattauer Kr. Böhm. geb. 53 J. alt, des / Georg Bartl, eines herrschaftl[ichen] Hofdieners, und der Maria / Watruba, beyde verst. e. e. T[ochter]
But there is more. On 6 April 1814, Nebe stood godfather to a daughter of his friend Joseph Illichmann in the parish church of Alservorstadt, and in the baptismal record he put the flamboyant (and pretentious) signature: "Wolfgangus Amade edl[er] V[on] Nebe Mpa".

 Wolfgang Amade Nebe pretending to be a nobleman in 1814 (Alservorstadt 10a, 6 April 1814)

When Wolfgang Amade Nebe died on 11 June 1839, at his home in Breitenfeld 15 (today Laudongasse 40) of abdominal dropsy, his supposed assets turned out to be fictitious. His widow Anna Nebe drew her widow's pension for 26 more years. She died at 82, of old age, on 12 November 1865 (Wiener Zeitung, 15 Nov 1865, 486).

How could Mozart's godfatherhood have remained undetected for so long? From my decade-long experience investigating the great composers of the Viennese classical era in the Vienna's church records I draw the following conclusion: musicians (even if they had a permanent position) were not valued among professional colleagues as godparents. People preferred aristocrats, civil servants, artisans, and citizens with a secure income. For example, none of the godparents of Johann Georg Albrechtsberger's 15 children was a musician. Of course, prominent musicians appear in the Vienna church books, particularly Antonio Salieri, who as Hofkapellmeister was an enthusiastic godfather and witness, or Joseph Haydn (of whom I have so far been able to identify nine previously unknown godchildren). But it is obvious that Mozart avoided familial responsibilities of this kind, and his absence as a godparent to the children of composers and musicians who were his friends, seems to suggest a definitive reluctance. In this he showed almost the same intentional reticence as Ludwig van Beethoven and Franz Schubert.



This discovery was first published in my article "Mozarts Patenkind", in: Acta Mozartiana 58, vol. 1 (June 2011), 57-70.

© Dr. Michael Lorenz 2013.

Updated: 7 April 2023